Skip to content

While the US Federal Reserve has yet to declare a victorious soft landing, the economy has improved markedly from just two years ago. Inflation has cooled substantially and the labor market has returned to a more sustainable path. “The risks to our goals are now balanced,” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President Mary Daly said recently. “… data dependence does not mean being data reactive. It means looking forward as the information comes in and projecting how we think the economy will evolve.”

For Daly, this refers to optimal monetary policy. For investors, this can be taken as a cue to stay disciplined and diversified. And in a declining rate-cycle environment, this brings into focus the merits of the often-overlooked US midcap-stock segment. The underallocation is clear: Investments in large-cap mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are roughly nine times greater than those in mid-cap mutual funds and ETFs.1

In recent months, however, we’ve seen a rotation away from the “magnificent” but overvalued technology darlings and toward what we consider more attractively valued midcaps, which feature lower risk profiles than small caps and yet have faster growth prospects than their larger peers.

Since the end of the second quarter, US mid-cap performance (as measured by the Russell MidCap Index) has outpaced that of both large- and small-cap stocks (as measured by the Russell 1000 Index and Russell 2000 Index, respectively).2 Zoom out further and the asset class appears to us even more appealing for long-term investors, with mid-cap stocks (as measured by the S&P MidCap 400 Index) having outperformed their large-cap and small-cap counterparts (as measured by the S&P 500 Index  and S&P Small Cap 600 Index, respectively) over the past three decades.3 In particular, it’s worth noting the average outperformance of midcaps following seven rate-cut periods since the mid 1990s as shown in the following chart.

Exhibit 1: Equity Total Returns Following First Fed Rate Cuts

Average Cumulative Total Returns Following First Fed Rate Cuts
Includes Seven Rate Cut Periods Since July 13, 1990

Note: These are average total returns for seven rate-cut periods beginning on July 13, 1990, July 6, 1995, September 29, 1998, January 3, 2001, September 18, 2007, August 1, 2019, and March 16, 2020. Data for S&P 400 is available from July 1, 1991.

Sources: Bloomberg, S&P Dow Jones Indices, Russell Indices. Large Cap = S&P 500; Mid Cap = S&P 400. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is designed to measure the performance of 400 mid-sized companies, reflecting the distinctive risk and return characteristics of this market segment. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.

A rate-cutting cycle tends to foster a stimulative environment since smaller firms tend to borrow more than larger companies. With rate cuts setting the stage for lowered debt servicing costs, we believe this could serve as a catalyst for improved mid-cap earnings, and generally view this as an opportunity for investors to plug gaps in allocation exposure given the potential for a mid-cap comeback.

For some perspective on the valuation opportunity, midcaps in late October were trading at 20.6x, a relative discount to large-cap stocks, which have been trading higher (at 24.6 times earnings) than their 20-year average (of 19.4x).4

Another attractive characteristic is the relative sector diversification of midcaps to large caps. Given ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) concentration concerns, it’s worth noting that at the end of September, technology holdings comprised more than 31% of the S&P 500 Index and more than 34% of the large-cap focused Russell 1000 Index compared to just about 9% of the S&P 400 Index and 12% in the Russell MidCap Index.5

And while utility companies were the best performers (+29% total returns year-to-date through October 14, 2024) for the mid-cap index, they held the lowest weighting within large-cap benchmarks. Industrials and materials sectors, which are underrepresented in the large-cap universe, may also be poised for expansion considering recent US stimulus bills aimed at building-out US manufacturing capabilities.

This is not to say AI-related firms may not still see impressive growth, but the pace of growth may decelerate and open the door for other segments of the market to shine, as smaller firms become less hampered by debt.

Exhibit 2: MidCaps Sector Breakdown

Sector Breakdown, US Large- and Mid-Cap Exposures
As of September 30, 2024

Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices. Large Cap = S&P 500; Mid Cap = S&P 400. The S&P MidCap 400 Index is designed to measure the performance of 400 mid-sized companies, reflecting the distinctive risk and return characteristics of this market segment. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot directly invest in them. They do not include fees, expenses or sales charges. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future performance. See www.franklintempletondatasources.com for additional data provider information.

Boosted in part by soft landing hopes, midcaps have been enjoying improved earnings guidance and we’ve seen several companies on a positive growth trajectory. According to FTSE Russell, more than two dozen constituents rose through the ranks from the Russell 2000 to join the Russell MidCap Index during this year’s portfolio reconstitution, with the highest number and weight of graduates coming from the technology industry.

To end on an optimistic note and quote from Fed President Daly: “A durable and sustained expansion allows everyone to thrive, and history tells us it is possible.”



IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is provided for general informational purposes only and should not be considered individualized investment advice, a recommendation or a solicitation to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. Franklin Templeton accepts no liability for losses arising from use of this material.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager as of the publication date and may change without notice. These opinions and analyses are based on certain assumptions, including market conditions that may change. They may differ from those of other portfolio managers or from the firm as a whole.

This material is not intended to provide a complete analysis of all material facts regarding any country, region or market. No assurance can be given that any forecast, projection or prediction regarding economies or financial markets will be realized. References to specific securities are for illustrative purposes only and should not be interpreted as recommendations or a solicitation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

Any research or analysis in this material has been prepared by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and is provided incidentally. While the information included is believed to be reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed, and it is subject to change without notice.

Past performance does not guarantee future results, or any profit or gain. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Franklin Templeton offers environmental, social and governance (ESG) capabilities, though not all strategies or products incorporate ESG as part of the investment process.

Investment strategies and services may not be available in all jurisdictions. Please consult your financial professional or Franklin Templeton contact for further information.

Brazil: Issued by Franklin Templeton Brasil Ltda. Canada: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments Corp. Franklin Templeton and Franklin Templeton Canada are business names used by Franklin Templeton Investments Corp. Offshore Americas: In the United States, this publication is made available by Franklin Templeton. United States: Issued by Franklin Templeton. Investments are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed.

Europe: Issued by Franklin Templeton International Services S.à r.l., 8A, rue Albert Borschette, L-1246 Luxembourg. Poland: Issued by Templeton Asset Management (Poland) TFI S.A.; Rondo ONZ 1; 00-124 Warsaw. Saudi Arabia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Financial Company, KAFD, Building 3.09, Office No. 8018, Level 8, Saudi Arabia. Regulated by CMA. License no. 23265-22. South Africa: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments SA (PTY) Limited, which is authorised by the FSCA as a Financial Service Provider (No.44475). Switzerland: Issued by Franklin Templeton Switzerland Ltd, Talstrasse 41, CH-8001 Zurich. Middle East & Africa (ex South Africa): Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (ME) Limited, which is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority. Address: Franklin Templeton, The Gate, East Wing, Level 2, Dubai International Financial Centre, P.O. Box 506613, Dubai, U.A.E. Tel: +971(04) 428 4100. United Kingdom: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited (FTIML), registered office: Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6HL.

Australia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Australia Limited (ABN 76 004 835 849) (Australian Financial Services License Holder No. 240827), Level 47, 120 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000. Hong Kong: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investments (Asia) Limited. Japan: Issued by Franklin Templeton Japan Co., Ltd. South Korea: Issued by Franklin Templeton Investment Advisors Korea Co., Ltd. Malaysia: Issued by Franklin Templeton Asset Management (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. & Franklin Templeton GSC Asset Management Sdn. Bhd. Singapore: Issued by Templeton Asset Management Ltd. (UEN) 199205211E.

Access your local website at https://www.franklintempleton.com/corporate/all-sites.

CFA® and Chartered Financial Analyst® are trademarks owned by CFA Institute.

Copyright © 2026 Franklin Templeton. All rights reserved.